|
Artist's Statement: |
||||
| Ekstasis | ||||
| I
do not consider my artistic practice to be a distinct category of my
role as a social agent and communicator.
Rather, I approach all forms of communication and social interaction
with a singular belief: the political realm extends through all levels
of thought and action via the constructions of selfhood. I am therefore
explicitly interested in understanding, critiquing and manipulating
social and psychological conceptions of identity—activities requiring
the expansion and critical apprehension of one’s own subjectivity.
Therefore, the essential principle |
||||
| of my work is ekstasis ( | ): | |||
Ecstatic
gnosis, it seems to me, was not knowledge with the purpose of controlling
or mastering the Other, but a cosmological knowledge, a means of knowing
the Other in order to know oneself anew. It is a mental revolt against
the normalized and naturalized self. |
||||
—Costas
M. Constantinou, States of Political Discourse |
||||
Ecological
Consiousness |
||||
I apply
the methodology and themes of the ecological sciences to what I do and
make in order to redraft the discussion around the politics of identity—not
to come to biological conclusions for social situations, but rather
to generate critical thought from a systemic and ecologically aware
point of view. The greatest injustices and most urgent suffering I have
witnessed in my life—whether taking the forms of speciesism, racism,
sexism, exploitation or bigotry—all stem from a misunderstanding
of the nature of the self, and the obscured sensation of the community
of living beings. I hope to make work that operates within and inspires
an ecological consciousness—by which I mean a way of
thinking, interpreting, and feeling culture as a function of relationships
between living beings and their environments. |
||||
Language
Activism |
||||
My practices include community activism,
film and video making, the directing and production of performance and
theater works, writing in and across multiple forms/genres, object making,
illustration and design, curational and organizational experiments,
music and sound composition, and combinations of any/all of these categories.
For every realm of cultural production in which I engage I attempt to
understand and willfully manipulate my position as a subject of official
and vernacular languages (or grammars) that operate within and recede
from each realm as constructed modes of social agency. My practice is
therefore essentially an activism within the languages and referential
systems of the particular medium/media in which I am working. |
||||
| Critical "Dress-Up" | ||||
As a performance and theater maker
I address the performative event as a community gathering
composed of individuals democratically generating and examining the
meanings of actions conducted by live performers in space and time.
By expanding the notion of a performance to this point, it becomes possible
for the performing community to temporarily “try-on”, like
a critical playing of “dress-up”, any number of pretenses
and contexts for performing social roles with our bodies—including
entertainment, technical demonstration, catharsis, indoctrination, protest,
orgy, or baptism. I have made performance work that deals with the extinction
of animal species, the politics of environmental devastation, gender
and class-based formulations of personal mythologies, the confusion
of domesticity and motherhood, the perversion of imagination in colonialism—all
issues with which I have had a personal experience or in which my social
role is implicated. The examination of my position as a cultural producer
within the referential systems specific to the live-art medium have
led me to approach the performative event as an open-ended and democratic
construction of meaning—rendering the constructions of “character”,
“plot”, “choreography” and “text”
open for debate. I often incorporate external texts into my performances—such
as legal documents, corporate transcripts, interviews with victims of
crimes, pop-song lyrics—by having performers re-voice and re-contextualize
them, thereby using the performance event to question constructions
of identity. |
||||
Technical
Adaptation |
||||
As
a film/video maker as well as a digital or “web” artist,
I am responding to a referential system which, despite the accelerating
proliferation of tools and formats called “new media”, has
been leveled by the standardization of two-dimensional time-based work
into interchangeable bits per second. Although nominally differentiated
by various dispensing appliances/platforms, the absorption of the once
distinct referential systems of film, television, video, and interactive
digital media into an ever-increasing bandwidth has rendered the filmmaker’s
language susceptible to the meanings found in these other, “newer”
forms. For me, this situation mandates two technical adaptations: firstly,
that I re-expose within the image its specific methods of production
which are otherwise becoming obscured by digital standardization specifically
and by capitalism in general; secondly, that I re-focus my position
as a producer of moving images in relationship to this significantly
broadened referential system. In my moving image practice these technical
mandates are enacted by a series of framing devices: the dependence
of empathetic and sympathetic responses to characters and situations
upon their aesthetic components (such as the design and “fashion”
of chemical protective garments, or the superimposition of documentary
images of Greek Jews in internment camps upon the theatrical images
of actors playing their parts), and—as with my performance work—a
“trying-on” of various cultural pretenses for the production
and consuming of moving images (such as demonstration video, romantic
melodrama, pornography, or hallucinatory abstraction). |
||||
A
Thousand Selves |
||||
Finally, it
is in writing that I find the ability to most directly access the
transfiguration of subjectivity.
As the most fundamental aspect of my practice and of my life, I am
utterly devoted in writing and reading to the constant and complete
restructuring of selfhood. It is entirely possible and recommendable
to experience a thousand different selves in a line of poetic text—as
a reader, a writer, or as both simultaneously. Writing, unless reduced
to economic functionality, is always ecstatic, and is therefore the
essence of any other activity in which I represent myself. Besides
writing from within localized languages for critical and expository
purposes, I most naturally write from a transfigured or multiple point
of view: in a long work-in-progress called Night X, the author
internalizes de-centralized mythic narratives—such as the Thousand
and One Nights, the Mahabharata, a thrift store, or
the internet.
|
||||
| The Non-concrete | ||||
Due to my understanding of the inextricable
connection of art and politics, I am always investigating political
theories of art making in order to create work that can function for
diverse audiences in a democratic and non-dogmatic manner. As an essentially
political being, I strive to be an active individual within a positive
and dynamic movement. It is necessary that the theoretical foundation
of this movement be fluid and malleable, democratic and de-centered,
inclusive and emancipatory—it is not necessary or even desirable
that it be "concrete", because an effective movement must
be able to incorporate a diversity of techniques and methodologies. |
||||
| 03/07 | ||||